CEPA? CECA? ECFA? Horse puncture government cross-strait economic protocol lies one, two, three
(Article source: "The policy would" blog)
by policy
Economic agreements not just an economic problem
1 lie: Vice Premier Paul Chiu said that the sign CECA is an economic issue, not a political issue. |
In fact, CECA or ECFA and not just for economic and export markets, which affect the cross-strait political agenda, economic interaction between the security, and industry and wealth redistribution is absolutely necessary detailed assessment and policy discussion process.
Economic integration at all over the world are political issues. Any country in the world, when the selection with other countries on economic relations in the set up more closely the relationship between the discount, it is not possible without political considerations. Even the international media have CECA towards the unification of the two sides regarded as the major symbol is showing the outside world's worries. Horse government on this point can not be burying their heads in the sand and pretend invisible.
Lies II: The KMT legislative caucus, said the DPP opposed to CECA, is ideology. The truth is: CECA will affect every citizen's life and employment, regardless of ideology is the CECA signed mischief. |
In fact, cross-strait economic cooperation to enter into any agreement, are involved in Taiwan's sovereignty and economic autonomy, but also to Taiwan every small lives of ordinary people, can not be simplified into a question of ideology.
CECA whether or ECFA, Taiwan society has not fully discussed; horse from government never provided a complete assessment, told society: the actual content of the agreement are what? What conditions to carry out? Whether there are additional political price? Make any political concessions or dark disk? In the absence of information and open conditions, everything is a question mark.
When everything is blurred when the ruling party has only want to use "ideology," a big hat, wanted to challenge the voices of all screwdown, or even use foul language to describe those who oppose. This self-bent on promoting the attitudes, ideologies are true only cause trouble!
Lie three: SEF vice chairman Kao Koong-lian said that in other countries to sign FTA did not move toward unification. The truth is: China on Taiwan has political ambitions, other countries do not have this problem. |
In fact, other countries in the promotion of economic cooperation, are at the basis of mutual respect, will not have political unity or the issue of annexation. However, "Hu six" has been clearly shown that the two sides signed a comprehensive economic cooperation agreement, must be at the "one China" framework, harboring a unified political purposes has been very obvious.
Chinese long-ming said that the purpose of cross-strait economic and trade exchanges are to contribute to "the reunification of the motherland." China's strategy is "promoting integration to businesses to government, and use people to force officials" to Taiwan to more Chinese high degree of economic dependence on China is planning a unified channel for Taiwan to fall into the trap of China.
We must not be so naive as to think, in the economic protocol can easily evade the question of sovereignty. Since according to the International Court of Justice confirmed the rigidity of long-term principle, Taiwan and China in the implementation of the signing of the so-called "economic issues," the process of legal documents, anyone involved in the sovereignty of dwarfing the "default" will result in international law on the sovereignty of our identified adverse results. Such self-generated by default legally binding, compared to China's diplomacy on the political pressure, it can be said even more terrifying.


























